Muggle Matters Home
About our site
Make Site Suggestions
Narrative defined (Merlin)
Silver & Gold (Merlin)
Elendil's Sword (Pauli)
"X" Marks/Chiasm (Merlin)
Literary Approaches (Merlin)

Travis Prinzi




Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

We hope you enjoy reading our Harry Potter discussion weblog. Please feel free to leave a comment and return often for more discussion.



 
 
View blog reactions
Add to Google
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

On Seekers
Rialb on Slugs and Slughorn
Umbridge's Shadow
Earth and Sky: The Divided House of the Seekers
The 8th Horcrux: The Scar and Last Things
Number 4 Privet Drive and the Order of the Seeker:...
Remembering the X
The Toads Tacky Tastes
Blast Ended Slugs in Books 2 and 6
Peeves: The Ghost-world's "Polter-Crux"


----------------------------------------------------------------------- -->

Hogwarts, Hogwarts,
Hoggy Warty Hogwarts,
Teach us something please,
Whether we be old and bald,
Or young with scabby knees,
Our heads could do with filling,
With some interesting stuff,
For now they're bare
And full of air,
Dead flies and bits of fluff.
So teach us stuff worth knowing,
Bring back what we forgot,
Just do your best
We'll do the rest,
And learn until our brains all rot!



1: The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
2: Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
3: There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
4: Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun,
5: Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race.
6: His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.
7: The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple.
8: The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes.
9: The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether.
10: More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb.
11: Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward.
12: Who can understand his errors? cleanse thou me from secret faults.
13: Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not have dominion over me: then shall I be upright, and I shall be innocent from the great transgression.
14: Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O LORD, my strength, and my redeemer.

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Fluids and Fluidity: Potions and Horcruxes

This is a post I promised a while ago, but it has to do also with some upcoming stuff on the "psychic physics" of Rowling's world and the discovery of the Red-Hen writer.

Potions and Horcruxes

I have had this thought since around 2/12, that what we have said before about Potions as connected to the water element and cunning etc: That potions is a sort of "cruxing" that has the potential for "horrible crossings." In Potions you mix magical elements together, sometimes you want them to blend, and sometimes you want to keep them separate (hence my theory on how exactly the Sectum Sempra spell might be used in potions - to cut elements in such a way that they will not recombine once in solution - following on Pauli's observations from others that the spell may be not originally so dark and may be a very commonly useful one). In either case, Potions as an art is practically defined by the con-joining different magical elements.

Fluids and Fluidity

To see this tenet if potions as a form of magic, it helps to contrast it to charms and transfiguration, both of which are based in spells and require a wand. The word-play in the sub-title has to do with the obvious fact that a potion is usually a fluid, but the furthermore with the fact that spell-based wand-magic requires a certain fluidity that potions does not. Potions requires precise calculations and precision in chronological timing (cf the post on "narrative defined," perma-linked on the left side bar), but Charms and Transfiguration require, in short, a certain grace of movement and speech. Notice in book 1 the introductory first year Transfiguration lesson and the teaching of "ferraverto." Notice also, in that same book, Flitwick's emphasis on the "swish and flick" in the "wingardium leviosa" charm. Another good place to look for the importance of this fluidity and grace is in the "Dumbledore's Army" chapter of book 5 - there is a lot in what Harry notices about how people are doing the spells.

Calculations and Cunning

As I said, Potions requires a high level of calculation (or cunning, in the sense that you say a cunning person is very "calculating"), in contrast to the fluid grace required for the other arts. This calculation connects with what I have said in many places about Divination. In short, there are 4 arts involved in this consideration on calculations: Astronomy, Astrology, Divination and Arithmancy.

AstroLOGY is the application of "logic" to the movements of the stars; AstroNOMY, on the other hand, takes that more intuitive thing of logic and turns it into an iron-clad law ("nomos" = the Greek word for "law") - just as "science" seeks to impose a tyranny of materialism over human physicality (I would call human physicality "Flesh and Blood" vs the "calculating" term used by somebody like DesCartes, "Res Extensia" - or "extended reality" - ie physical matter, vs spiritual matter, which he called "Res Cogitens" or "thinking reality")

As we find out from Firenze in book 5, even true prophecy (ie, that of when the Centaurs get it right, which takes years and is tenuous - vs what Trelawney does most of the time), in the sense of fore-casting, is not that sure and not that valuable. What Trelawney usuaully does is not even this level, but a mere sham of it - and her valid prophecies have nothing to do with her active reading of stars or crystal balls or tea leaves, but an unconscious trance in which she basically channels the voice of true prohecy.

So, we have 3 sceinces that deal with the stars and fortune telling, and the worst of them, I think, is Astronomy (IE Dumbledore's death atop the tower, Sinistra as professor etc)- that which seeks to apply the tyrannical "laws" of science (which were not really ever meant to be prescriptive laws, but rather descriptive) to the stars, and I would call this an evil manipulation of the role of the science of mathematics, a complete marterialization of it (ie making it a solely materialist enterprise rather than one ope to the evidence of the transcendant breaking into and out of the material of nature). The answer to the "tyranny of science" is, as you can guess I would say, Arithmancy:

Arithmancy is the use of names and numbers to tell about a person's character. Arithmancy is also known as Numerology. The only information given is that the subject is quite hard — therefore attractive to Hermione — and running parallel to Divination lessons at Hogwarts. An optional subject, taught from the third year to the seventh.
(taken from here)

All of the stuff here on Divination and Astronomy vs Arithmancy has been really for the purpose of developing this idea of the character and place (in relation to other central tensions such as magic numerology and prohpecy) of the "calculation" of cunning used in potions so you can get a better idea

Interesting: Polyjuice in the "X"

This is just sort of a side-thought in light of the chiastic sturcture of the series - I had thought at one point this might be a clue to something about Horace Slughorn but I found a simpler answer.

One of the key potions in the series thus far has been Polyjuice Potion. As I said in the Chiasm post (cf left side-bar), look for an element in book 4 as the center and then it's presence in an earlier book and then in the matching later book. So I saw PJ potion in 4, and in 2 ... and I thought "OOOOOOOOHH? Was Sluggo really somebody else?" - but then I realized that the presence in book 6 was already known and was minor: Crabb and Goyle as the two girls Harry always sees Draco with. Maybe there is something more going on with Crabb and Goyle being girls etc but I think my main point here is just to realize what a central role potions play, as evidenced the way PJ potion is used in the x-structure. It only fits, that potions relate in a central way to the idea of Horcruxes.

Other Cruxes

This whole thing of cruxes and conjuctions is HUGE in the works. In looking up the stuff above on Arithmancy, I was looking up Sinistra first and found a list there of Hogwarts' courses arranged by those which are required and those which are optional (btw, did anybody else notice that it was Percy Weasley who suggested to Harry to take Divination?). This was connected to the list of professors, minor and major. And who can remember the name of the ministry approved Apparition instructor for 6th years? Twycross - two crosses (maybe "double-cross?") Remember that in the "Potters Pains" post I talked about the uniquely heightened awareness Harry has of the nature of this wandless form of magic.
posted by Merlin at 1:18 PM


Comments on "Fluids and Fluidity: Potions and Horcruxes"

 

Blogger jkr2 said ... (February 28, 2006 4:45 PM) : 

ok, welll i just made it through the 'premature predictions' post on red hen. i am feeling kind of confunded.
firstly - does this guy (presuming it's a guy) actually like the books? i'm not sure.
i am not sure where the whole dementors creating dark lords thing really comes from, and some of what he said seemed to be trying to make the potterverse fit his theory... i dunno.
there were so many "this is how it *should* be and wasn't" comments that i wasn't sure what to do with, and he seems disdainful of rowling somehow, and yet here's this whole site FULL of info.

so i guess i was confused about the essence of it. what is the central crux of his interest? i think i'll "get him" better if i can work that out i will be able to *hear* the info.

jo

 

Blogger Pauli said ... (February 28, 2006 5:02 PM) : 

I think Red-Hen is a red-haired woman. Unclear.

Meanwhile Janet "Quoth The Maven" B. has a potions/Slughorn post which has a few insights on the "love potion".

 

Blogger Merlin said ... (February 28, 2006 7:25 PM) : 

I think Red Hen likes the books but may be a bit confused on some things and thus a bit frustrated - the ones that stick out to me are the nature of "mystery" stories and the nature and role of prophecy in general and in Rowling's world.

Not sure whether RH is man or woman ... probably intentionally so - the internet neighborhood not always being the safest etc.

but on what RH's point is, I think RH's point is to figure out what is going on in the books ... simply to make sense of it, find a consinstent logic to it ... wnich in works of this nature can be frustrating at times because it is basically the same frustration of trying to see the sense in some of the things that happen to you in your life.

But what I will say is what I said to Pauli in an emial, which is that, whether RH realizes this is his/her niche or not, RH is, hands down, the best I have seen at plumbing the depths of the physics of Rowling's "Potterverse" in a way congruous to espounding how it fits with the symbolism - how, in the line of "incarnational literature" even the physics is informed by the higher things - and the pathway is the human soul, which is what RH incorporates really well into showing how Rowlingian physics is a physics of the psychic, of the human soul. I think that is one of the reasons it might be frustrating reading RH, there is a drive to work it all out, ALL of it - including the mundane physics of it, which is a frustrating world because the material world is, quite honestly, very messy. But it is also what Rowling's world is about ... the meaning of the wizard's life lies in the helping of muggles to transcend muggleness while realizing they can never escape be muggles and that "transcending" is always something other than "abandoning" - the mundane muggle details have their own distinct dignity

To quote Johnny Cash, "Flesh and Blood needs Flesh and Blood"

The Dementors thing is interesting - and I think possible in that there is precedent for something of the sort - can't remember the name for sure but I think it was an "incubus" that was a demon and would take flesh, seduce a woman, and the devil would be able to incarnate in the child - not exactly the same but it does provide a general thematic/elemental template for the thing that RH is suggesting, which realy does fit what Rowling has said about the dementors as the incarnation of despair and depression - in short, they're demons, "evil spirits who prowel about the world for the ruin of souls". (from the end of the prayer to St Michael the Archangel)

I also love RH's shorthand, like "Quirrelmort" and "Vapor Mort"

And I hope my explanation of what I see as RH's great contribution hasn't made things even muddier, as I sometimes have a tendency to do :)

 

Blogger jkr2 said ... (February 28, 2006 8:28 PM) : 

yes, that helps a lot actually.
not muddier at all.

i think i was seeing rh trying to make something neat which isn't necessarily neat - and you articulate that really well. it's like the limitations of the world kind of *are* the point instead of getting in the way of the point.

how do you fit in though that RH seems to have a disdain for the 'higher' aspirations of what *should* be a who dunnit?

and i have heard 'quirrel mort' etc before. perhaps they were quoteing RH.

cheers,
jo

 

Blogger Merlin said ... (March 01, 2006 8:46 PM) : 

That's a good question - about RH's seeming disdain for the departure from the "mystery story" format of the first 4 books. My answer kind of gets into a broader consideration I'll write on it in a post, but I'll spit my thoughts out here quickly to because I'm not sure I'll get to writing those posts in the next day.

Anyway, I think it is a sort of frustration for RH, and admitted one. What I think she (going on Pauli's suggestion RH is a woman)is saying that she has marked and recognized the shift in format and thus it is ok since now she can tell what it is, ie not judge the story by "whodunnit" standards when it is no longer a whodunnit. It is not a "mystery" in the theological/mystery sense, and now she knows that she is not really criticizing it, although she is saying she is personally much more of a fan of the "whodunnit" style story (this fits with her forte being the physics of Rowling's world ... since the "whodunnit" style is a very physical one, resting on physical evidence and careful attention to the physical evidence that the author drops as clues to the reader etc)

This is really the case since book 5 - book 4 was the last of the "whodunnit" format and the first of the "higher mysteries" format (a bit like the formula of the 4 cardinal virtues of prudence, temperence, fortitude and justic and the 3 Theological virtues of faith, hope and love) of book 5-7, the black stage, the white stage and the red stage of the alchemical process.

So, in other words, RH may be a little cranky at times over the frustration but I don't think she is full criticizing, just sort of venting some steam when some aspects frustrated her pinning down what Rowling is doing ... which is her thing, and I think she does it pretty well.

RH is very knowledgable ... when she started talking about a "spirit journey" I thought, "bingo, now you're getting it ... it is about spiritual things" and then realized I was being kind of a dolt ... she already knew that as the backdrop and accepted it and "spirit journey" is a specific genre of story she was saying is a strong possibility ... like Harry seeing inside Voldy's actions while never leaving his bed, or the head traveling through the flu network while the knees remain firmly on the floor (wish she had comments, who love to pass that off to her as a possible clue in book 5 of a forthcoming "spirit journey" format) ... Harry may have his body fimrly planted in that room with the veil while his spirit goes on a journey beyond the veil, like Ulysses, Aneus and Dante sojourning in the lan dof the dead. RH knows her forms well and is good at following the threads. I think she is a very rigorous analyst (she is VERY thorough ... would have cold-clocked Snape's class with no problem)and an honest one, albeit sometimes a wee bit cranky in being honest about being frustrated in pinning some things about the story down :)

 

Blogger Merlin said ... (March 01, 2006 8:47 PM) : 

sorry ... should have been "it is NOW a mystery in the theological or mystical sense" not "it is NOT a mystery in the theological sense"

 

Blogger jkr2 said ... (March 02, 2006 2:59 AM) : 

this is where acadamia frustrates me a little.
thouroughly knowing the forms and having a rigourous approach is something i admire and aspire to (though doubt i'll ever have the time/discipline to achieve that!)but it seems that people lose the ability to just receive from something.
so it has to fit into this or that box to have merit. i know that sometimes things not fitting can be because they are sloppily done. but sometimes it is a good thing, and can be because they may transcend those boxes, or even be something new altogether!

this has been my experience with music (particularly in the classical world, there are - as you can imagine - some real stylistic snobs out there. i have my own share of cultural snobbism. i'm not immune! but i think i see it *shrug*). there are certain types of music that you enjoy the more you understand, and that can be quite cerebral. i love that. but it's not the be all and end all.

rave rave. sorry i'll take it over to my blog since it's probably veering too far o.t.

http://cluelessramblingsofjkr2.blogspot.com/2006/03/limitations-of-type.html

cheers all
jo

 

post a comment




Blog Directory & Search engine

Syndicate Muggle Matters (XML feed)
iPing-it!